02 / SEE THE OTHER SIDE
Depth, not just a headline price.
We plan to show available quantity, bid-ask spreads, and order-book depth together. Live refresh and historical depth are research priorities; liquidity is never guaranteed.
Prediction markets. In development.
Conviction deserves
clear terms.
Pact is building a more transparent prediction-market experience. Visible trading costs, readable order books, and settlement rules you can inspect before you commit.
Pre-launch concept. Trading is not yet available.
PACT / PRODUCT THESIS01 — CLARITY FIRST
Our founding commitments
Costs before commitment
Rules before results
Evidence over assumptions
The product blueprint
Less guesswork.
More informed decisions.
Built from a documentation audit of Kalshi, Polymarket, Myriad, and Novig. These are design priorities—not claims about a live product.
01 / MAKE THE COST LEGIBLE
The price is only part of the trade.
Our proposed approach: fees at execution, a simple fee breakdown at order entry, and a $0 maker-fee policy. Final rates and incentives will be published before launch.
The transparency standard
Contract costVisible
Execution feeItemized
Total commitmentBefore you confirm
03 / KNOW HOW IT ENDS
Defined outcomes. Inspectable rules.
Our target is rules-based settlement with a named outcome source and automatic crediting. Binary contracts would pay $1 for a winning outcome and $0 for a losing one.
Payout is not profit. Purchase costs and fees still apply, and a losing contract can lose its entire purchase value.
No evidence? No claim.
The audit did not establish comparative liquidity, idle-balance yield, or discovery quality. Those questions remain open—not promises dressed up as features.
Start with the evidence
Better markets start
with better questions.
Explore the official documentation behind the blueprint. Our next step is to validate liquidity, costs, and settlement UX before launch.